I'm skimming through a semi-interesting book called
My Ishmael, Daniel Quinn's sequel to the brilliant
Ishmael, and am thinking that I may have to go back through and skim more thoroughly. I checked it out from our school library because I adored the first one and thought that this one might take it to new places. Well, the first 20 pages were a near-perfect facsimile of the first 20 pages of
Ishmael, and I became a little disappointed and pessimistic about where else Daniel Quinn could take his ideas, so I stopped. Last night, though, I skimmed back through it and found that he actually takes his ideologies about human and social development and applies them to education. His works are highly misanthropic on the surface, but I'm sure he would argue that they are actually aimed against modernity and the egoistic evolution of mankind into gods, particularly in the West. It's hard for me to capture the spirit of his works (it's also been some time since I read
Ishmael), so I'll give you an excerpt from
My Ishmael as an example.
I wanted to show you a model of education that works for people. It works very simply, without cost, without effort, without administration of any kind. Children simply go wherever they want and spend time with whomever they want in order to learn the things they want to learn when they actually want to learn them. Not every child's education is identical. Why on earth should it be? The idea is not that every child should receive the entire heritage but rather that every generation should receive it. And it is received, without fail; this is proved by the fact that society continues to function, generation after generation, which it couldn't do if its heritage were not being transmitted faithfully and totally, generation after generation.Another excerpt:
Every one of your systems is a utopian system. Democracy would be heaven--if people would just be better than people have ever been... And of course your schools would work perfectly under the same conditions.And this is brilliant:
Your basic citizen's education wasn't expanded from four grades to eight in order to include astronomy, microbiology, and zoology. It wasn't expanded from eight grades to twelve grades in order to include astrophysics, biochemistry, and paleontology. It wasn't expanded from twelve grades to sixteen in order to include exobiology, plasma physics, and heart surgery. Today's graduates don't leave school with all the advances of the past hundred years in their heads. Just like their great-great-grandparents a century ago, they leave with enough in their heads to start at the bottom of the job market, flipping burgers, pumping gas, and bagging groceries. It just takes today's graduates a whole lot longer to get there.Take it or leave it, but he does make some interesting points. Of course, some of his solutions are whimsical, in my mind, but he would say that's because I've been acculturated into the system from birth, and the notion of anything else as functional is impossible for me to accept. For example, he says that a "tribal system" of education would be as or more efficient than any model we have today (I can't say I disagree completely); children would learn from parents and peers, "learn to read the same way they learned how to see, by being around sighted people," and so forth. Perhaps it's my cynicism, but I don't see this happening without some fundamental changes in our humanity and society (there's a "no duh" statement).
One more quote that's on his website:
One of the great, persistent myths of education in our culture is that children become reluctant learners as they grow older. In fact, what they become reluctant about is going to school, where they're bullied, regimented, bored silly, and very effectively prevented from learning. Providence
More later, must teach now.